 |
|
| Imax: Dinosaurs: Giants of Patagonia |  |  |  |
 |  | |
|
9 user reviews
|
|
|
  5.3/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: |
| Age: |
1-12 |
13-17 |
18-25 |
26-35 |
36-49 |
50+ |
Total |
Men:
Votes: |
-
0 |
-
0 |
10
1 |
5
1 |
3.3
3 |
-
0 |
5
5 |
Women:
Votes: |
-
0 |
-
0 |
-
0 |
5
2 |
3
1 |
-
0 |
4.3
3 |
Total:
Votes: |
-
0 |
-
0 |
10
1 |
6.2
4 |
3.2
4 |
-
0 |
5.3
9 |
|
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex. |
|
|
| |  |  |
| | |
|
Showing all 8 reviews...
|
|
|
Not enough dinosaurs. Too many long boring shots of inanimate objects. Unless you like old footage of paleontologists composited onto sunglasses and puddles, give this a miss.
5/10
10.21.2008 -
johnny_zero@ - age: 26-35
Awesome. I would definitely watch this over and over.
10/10
8.22.2008 -
dino_saur@ - age: 18-25
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
My 5 year old son was beside himself thinking about it as we stood in line. 15 minutes into it, he was sound asleep. This is more of a TV documentary, and not a very good one at that. The pacing is slow as molasses. Many, many takes of empty wasteland, filmed from some sort of aircraft. Sweeping takes of... a man driving his truck, a laptop sitting on a rock, a puddle on the ground and a pair of glasses. I wish I was kidding. Yes there are dinosaurs, no they don't impress anybody anymore. Not even in 3D and imax size. There are a few interesting takes, specially involving flying dinosaurs, but by the time they came up, I could not get my son to care. Save the money.
4/10
5.11.2008 -
imagremlin@ - age: 36-49
Very Misleading and definitely not worth the money paid. If this was on television I would skip over it in a second. Artsy-fartsy camera angles overshadow the whole movie.
1/10
9.9.2007 -
lnm@ - age: 36-49
This movie was the 1st IMAX movie i really enjoyed in quite a number of years. There is a lot of humour and the subject is treated well - you learn even if you know a lot about dinosaurs. Goood!
8/10
8.31.2007 -
lambertm2@ - age: 26-35
The title was confusing. We expected to see more animated dinosaurs in parallel with the discoveries in Patagonia. Most of if was about the museum and research. Interesting but boring for children.
3/10
8.27.2007 -
miliporth@ - age: 36-49
Pas très réaliste et ce, même en 3D.
2/10
6.20.2007 -
guylene,blouin@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
They did not show enough dinosaurs. It focused more on the paleontologist. It should be called "the paleontologist" Imax.
5/10
4.10.2007 -
roderick01@ - age: 36-49
|
| | | |
| Note: Reviews posted on this page are personal opinions expressed by our visitors. We are not responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
